Tuesday, October 18, 2022
HomeHealthV-Protected Database Confirms COVID Jab Hazards

V-Protected Database Confirms COVID Jab Hazards

In an October 4, 2022, Fox Information interview, civil rights legal professional Aaron Siri, authorized counsel for the Knowledgeable Consent Motion Community (ICAN), shared stunning V-Protected knowledge obtained from the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention after a number of authorized calls for.

For greater than 15 months, the CDC fought to not launch any of those knowledge. ICAN needed to file two lawsuits and a number of appeals to get the CDC handy it over, and if you see the info, you perceive why.

What Is V-Protected?

By now, many know concerning the existence of the Vaccine Antagonistic Occasions Reporting System (VAERS), a publicly out there database for vaccine hostile occasion stories, collectively managed by the CDC and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration.

V-Protected1 is one other database managed and monitored by the CDC. It is a voluntary “after vaccination well being checker” deployed to gather knowledge on those that acquired the COVID jab.

Anybody in the US can enroll in V-Protected, utilizing their smartphone, after receiving any dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Mother and father may enroll their underage youngsters to maintain tabs on well being results. In the course of the first week after every dose, V-Protected will ship you a each day textual content message asking for particulars in your well being and well-being. After that, check-ins are despatched out on an intermittent foundation.

What Does V-Protected Present?

So, what does the V-Protected knowledge, which the CDC was so reluctant to launch, really present? Are the COVID jabs as innocent as they’re claimed to be? Removed from it.

As detailed by Siri, out of the ten million folks enrolled in V-Protected, 7.7% (770,000 folks) required medical care after getting the shot and 25% (2.5 million folks) missed work or college or suffered a critical facet impact that affected their day-to-day life.

v-safe covid vaccine adverse health impacts

As famous by Siri, these numbers are extraordinary. One of many key messages we got was that whereas COVID was not a major risk to all folks, getting the shot would restrict the variety of hospitalizations, deaths and days missed from work because of an infection.

Properly, we now see that 25% of those that acquired the shot ended up lacking work or college due to the unwanted effects, and seven.7% wanted medical care. That is staggering, and fully nullifies the CDC’s argument that everybody ought to get the shot, whether or not they’re in a high-risk class or not, and whether or not they’ve already had COVID-19 or not.

Large Immune Response Sign

The V-Protected knowledge additionally present a large sign with regard to the jab inflicting an hostile immune response. 4 million folks, out of the ten million — 40% — reported joint ache. Two million, or 20%, reported “reasonable” joint ache and 400,000, or 4%, categorised the ache as “extreme.”

As famous by Siri, joint ache is commonly an indication of an immune response and might be trigger for concern when it happens after vaccination, particularly when you think about that the photographs had been supposed to guard the aged, who already are inclined to have joint issues.

v-safe covid vaccine symptoms

The V-Protected database additionally reveals that despite the fact that fewer doses of Moderna had been registered, it is mRNA shot accounts for a bigger portion of damaging results, in comparison with Pfizer’s jab.

ICAN has now constructed a searchable dashboard of this V-Protected knowledge.2 Within the video beneath, Albert Benavides (who goes by the title Welcome the Eagle 88), an RCM professional, knowledge analyst and auditor, supplies a tour and overview of learn how to use the dashboard, together with a few of its strengths and weaknesses.

Why Did the CDC Combat to Hold V-Protected Information Hidden?

In an October 5, 2022, Substack article, Steve Kirsch commented on the V-Protected knowledge dump:3

“V-Protected is a voluntary security monitoring program put in place by the CDC to observe hostile reactions after folks take a vaccine. The V-Protected knowledge exhibits that 33.1% of the individuals who acquired the vaccine suffered from a major hostile occasion and seven.7% needed to search skilled medical care.

These are extraordinary numbers. They clearly present the vaccines are unsafe, that the CDC intentionally hid this info from the American public, and that the drug corporations falsified the info within the trials … the CDC will not be defending the American folks. They’re defending the producers of the vaccines.”

As famous by Kirsch, unwanted effects might be both under- or overestimated in V-Protected, or each, as some would possibly ignore V-Protected requests to reply questions, and others could solely join or be incentivized to fill out the questionnaire in the event that they endure an issue.

Moreover, the choices for reporting a facet impact are predefined and really generic, so folks is likely to be experiencing results that did not match any of the predefined classes of damage. Importantly, dying will not be reportable to V-Protected, as useless folks can not use their telephones. So, we’ve no approach of realizing what number of of those 10 million registered V-Protected customers have died.

Nonetheless, “Whether or not the charges in V-Protected is over-reported or under-reported is a purple herring,” Kirsch says. “The difficulty that ought to concern everyone seems to be the CDC hid all of the V-Protected knowledge from everybody your entire time.”

Along with spending taxpayer {dollars} to forestall the discharge of this info — which we’ve each proper to — the CDC additionally stopped selling use of V-Protected round Could 2021, mere months into the COVID jab rollout. As famous by Kirsch, this was most likely as a result of “it grew to become crystal clear that it was accumulating knowledge that confirmed the vaccines had been unsafe.”

CDC Ignored Clear ‘Dying’ Sign

In an October 3, 2022, article,4 Kirsch additionally factors out that the formulation the CDC makes use of to set off security indicators — described in its VAERS customary working procedures guide5 — is “significantly flawed.” Might that be intentional as properly?

In July 2021, Matthew Crawford printed a three-part collection6,7,8 on how the CDC was hiding security indicators. In August 2021, Kirsch additionally knowledgeable the company of those issues, however was, in fact, ignored. Nonetheless, “even utilizing their very own flawed formulation, ‘dying’ ought to have triggered a sign,” he writes. But the CDC didn’t notify the general public of what they’d discovered. Here is an excerpt from Kirsch article:9

“If you’d like goal proof of whole ineptitude by the CDC and the medical group in monitoring the security of the COVID vaccines, that is the article you’ve got been ready for. We use their numbers and their very own algorithm and present that it ought to have triggered a security sign for ‘dying.’

There isn’t a approach they will argue their approach out of this one … We’d like look no additional than the vaccine security sign monitoring formulation10 utilized by the CDC to show our level …

The formulation the CDC makes use of for producing security indicators is basically flawed; a ‘dangerous’ vaccine with a number of hostile occasions will ‘masks’ giant numbers of vital security indicators … Let me summarize the important thing factors for you in a nutshell:

PRR [proportional reporting ratio] is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc11 as follows …

calculation of proportional reporting ratio

A ‘security sign’ is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc as a PRR of at the very least 2, chi-squared statistic of at the very least 4, and 3 or extra circumstances of the AE [adverse event] following receipt of the particular vaccine of curiosity. That is the well-known ‘and clause.’ Right here it’s from the doc:

proportional reporting ratio

Solely somebody who’s incompetent or is intentionally making an attempt to make the vaccines look secure would use the phrase ‘and‘ within the definition of a security sign. Utilizing ‘and’ signifies that if any one of many situations is not happy, no security sign will likely be generated. As famous beneath, the PRR will hardly ever set off which just about ensures that the majority occasions generated by an unsafe vaccine won’t ever get flagged.

The PRR worth for the COVID vaccines will hardly ever exceed 1 as a result of there are such a lot of hostile occasions from the COVID vaccine as a result of it’s so harmful (i.e., B within the formulation is a big quantity) so the numerator is all the time close to zero. Therefore, the ‘security sign’ is never triggered as a result of the vaccine is so harmful.”

A Fictitious Instance

Utilizing a fictitious vaccine as the instance, Kirsch goes on to clarify how an exceptionally harmful vaccine will fly beneath the radar and never get flagged, due to the CDC’s flawed formulation:12

“Suppose we’ve the world’s most harmful vaccine that causes hostile occasions in everybody who will get it and generates 25,000 totally different hostile occasions, and every hostile occasion has 1,000 situations.

That signifies that the numerator is 1,000/25,000,000 which is simply 40 occasions per million reported occasions. Now let’s take a look at actuals for one thing like deaths. For all different vaccines, there are 6,200 deaths and 1 million hostile occasions whole.

Since 40 per million is lower than 6,200 deaths per million, we’re not even near producing a security sign for deaths from our hypothetical vaccine which killed 1,000 folks in a yr … The purpose is {that a} harmful vaccine can look very ‘secure’ utilizing the PRR formulation.”

Calculating Dying Sign for COVID Jab

Subsequent, Kirsch calculates the PRR (proportional reporting ratio) for dying for the COVID jab, utilizing VAERS knowledge and the CDC’s definitions and formulation.

As of December 31, 2019, there have been 6,157 deaths and 918,717 hostile occasions whole for all vaccines apart from the COVID shot. As of September 23, 2022, there have been 31,214 deaths and 1.4 million hostile occasions whole for the COVID jabs. Here is the formulation as defined by Kirsch:13

“PRR = (31,214/1.4e6) / (6,157/918,717) = 3.32, which exceeds the required threshold of two. In different phrases, the COVID vaccine is so lethal that even with all of the hostile occasions generated by the vaccine, the dying sign didn’t get drowned out!

However there’s nonetheless the chi-square take a look at. Chi-square take a look at outcomes had been 18,549 for ‘dying,’ which enormously exceeds the required threshold of 4. The CDC chi-square take a look at is clearly happy for the COVID vaccine. As a result of the dying sign is so large, it even survived the PRR take a look at.

Because of this even utilizing the CDCs personal misguided … formulation, all three standards had been happy:

1. PRR>2 [PRR greater than 2]: It was 3.32

2. Chi-square>2 [Chi-square greater than 2]: It was 18,549

3. 3 or extra stories: There have been over 31,214 dying stories acquired by VAERS … which is greater than 3

A security sign ought to have been generated however wasn’t. Why not? … Does anybody care? Tons of of hundreds of American lives have been misplaced as a result of incapacity of the CDC to deploy their very own flawed security sign evaluation …

It has been identified since at the very least 2004 that utilizing reporting odds ratio (ROR) is a greater estimate of relative threat than PRR.14 I do not know why the CDC would not use it.”

CDC Can’t Declare It Did not Know

The CDC is chargeable for monitoring each VAERS and V-Protected, and between these two databases, there isn’t any potential approach they may ever say they did not know the photographs had been harming and killing thousands and thousands of Individuals.

The CDC additionally has entry to different databases, together with the Protection Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), which (earlier than it was deliberately altered15) confirmed large will increase in debilitating and deadly situations, together with a tripling of most cancers circumstances.16

The findings in these databases have by no means been introduced ahead throughout any of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) conferences or the FDA’s Vaccines and Associated Organic Merchandise Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) conferences, at which members have repeatedly voted to authorize the jabs to folks of all ages, together with infants and pregnant ladies.

If the CDC was actually monitoring these databases, as required, there’s merely no approach they may have continued to authorize these photographs based mostly on the info. Is that why these knowledge had been by no means reviewed? In all probability. ACIP and VRBPAC members, for no matter purpose, merely did not need to know the reality. However the CDC has identified all alongside, and there isn’t any excuse for not sharing and appearing on that knowledge.

Assist Unfold the Phrase

The media are ignoring all of this — the V-Protected knowledge and the CDC’s failure to behave on a transparent security sign (and the sign being dying, of all issues!), even when utilizing a formulation that was flawed from the beginning. So, unfold the phrase. Everybody must know these details. It is not hypothesis, it is the CDC’s personal knowledge.

The CDC wants to clarify why they spent our tax {dollars} to struggle the discharge of the V-Protected knowledge for 15 months, and why they did not halt the photographs when a “dying” sign was evident. The mainstream press, members of Congress, the medical group and Universities additionally want to clarify why they refuse to analyze these CDC knowledge. To that finish, listed here are a number of strategies for how one can assist:

Help Sen. Ron Johnson, presently the one senator prepared to analyze the reality of the COVID jabs.

Write or name your members of Congress and ask them to analyze the CDC’s security monitoring. As famous by Kirsch, “You merely can not have a security company not be capable of monitor security.”

Contact your native newspaper and urge them to analyze and report on the V-Protected knowledge, the VAERS knowledge and the CDC’s failure to behave when a security sign was detected.

Share the info on social media and ask why nobody within the media, Congress, academia or medical group is investigating these issues.

Share this info together with your physician and members of the medical group.

Additionally share it with college directors, and ask them to clarify how and why, in mild of those details, they’re nonetheless mandating COVID photographs for his or her college students.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments

%d bloggers like this: