Jamie Spears says the decide acquired it improper … Britney ought to have to sit down for a deposition and reply to the entire allegations she’s made about him and her time within the conservatorship.
In accordance with authorized docs, filed within the California Courtroom of Appeals and obtained by TMZ, Jamie says it is unfair the courtroom dominated he needed to sit for a deposition whereas Britney can get away with out having to sit down for one. The docs state, “The correct to take a deposition can hardly ever be denied. In California, discovery is a matter of proper.”
Jamie’s authorized group additionally argues Britney and her lawyer, Mathew Rosengart, didn’t set up good trigger to justify prohibiting her deposition … particularly given the very fact she made numerous claims towards Jamie for wrongdoing.
Jamie says if the courtroom had a problem with Britney’s deposition, it may have restricted the matters or questions coated … however as a substitute, it simply shut her deposition down altogether.
Jamie’s authorized group says the one-sidedness within the trial decide’s ruling violates fundamental equity … that if one celebration has to sit down for a depo, the opposite celebration ought to as properly.
The trial decide dominated no matter Jamie needed from Britney could possibly be obtained by way of writing. His authorized group clearly feels that would apply to him as properly, and now they’re gunning for equal remedy — he sits for a depo, then she ought to as properly.